### **Overview**
The Vandalia-Butler Board of Education scheduled a special meeting to consider approving a contract to outsource student transportation to **First Student**, a private company. While the move aims to save money and modernize the bus fleet, Editor Darrell Wacker argues that the process is being rushed, potentially damaging community trust and jeopardizing an upcoming financial levy.
—
### **Key Concerns & Arguments**
#### **1. Accelerated Timetable**
* **Initial Plan:** Discussions in April/May 2013 suggested a potential move in January 2014.
* **Current Reality:** The district moved to approve the contract in August, just before the start of the school year.
* **Quote:** *"I’ve never understood why the timetable for this has been accelerated so much and I think it’s a bad idea."*
#### **2. Impact on Personnel**
* **Contract Negation:** Bus drivers approved a new contract with the district in July, which is essentially being negated by this outsourcing move.
* **Hiring Uncertainty:** While officials claim drivers will get priority hiring and signing bonuses, Wacker notes the district cannot legally dictate the hiring practices of a private company.
* **Skepticism:** Drivers remain "solidly against" the move due to concerns over job security and the transition to a private employer.
#### **3. Contractor Reputation (First Student)**
* **Local Precedents:** Columbus City Schools recently voted not to renew their contract with First Student, and the company has faced documented troubles in Cincinnati.
* **Risk of Error:** Wacker warns that any early operational "hiccups" (e.g., a missed student) will result in significant negative publicity for the district.
#### **4. Political Consequences**
* **The November Levy:** The district is seeking a levy in November to establish firm financial footing.
* **Public Perception:** Wacker fears the "public ill will" generated by the speed and nature of the outsourcing could cause the levy to fail.
—
### **Financial Counter-Argument (Reader Insight)**
A comment by **Ben Jones** cites a study by Mark Cassell (Kent State University) titled *"Taking Them for a Ride: An Assessment of the Privatization of School Transportation in Ohio's Public School Districts."*
**Key Findings from the Study (1994–1998):**
* **Higher Costs:** Median districts that contracted out paid **24% to 50% more per pupil** than those keeping services in-house.
* **Per-Mile Costs:** Contracting districts saw costs **51% to 63% higher** at the median.
* **Lower Reimbursements:** Private-contracting districts often receive a lower percentage of cost reimbursements from the state compared to in-house programs.
—
### **Summary of District Goals**
Despite the criticism, the district's stated motivations for the move include:
* **Cost Savings:** Reducing the overall transportation budget.
* **Fleet Modernization:** Acquiring new buses that the district currently cannot afford to purchase outright.
* **Driver Incentives:** Offering signing bonuses and the ability for drivers to earn extra income through private charters.